<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Motion for a Recess &#187; taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motionforarecess.com/tag/taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motionforarecess.com</link>
	<description>Let&#039;s talk about the things that matter.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 20:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Gas Tax Repeal</title>
		<link>http://www.motionforarecess.com/2008/05/01/the-gas-tax-repeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.motionforarecess.com/2008/05/01/the-gas-tax-repeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cshenoy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motionforarecess.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal excise tax on gasoline has been the cause for major buzz in all the presidential campaigns recently. John McCain and Hillary Clinton are proposing a temporary lift on the tax (an 18.4 cent one, mind you) for the summer so that a partial burden is lifted off the American people&#8217;s shoulders. Seriously? Barack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal excise tax on gasoline has been the cause for major buzz in all the presidential campaigns recently. John McCain and Hillary Clinton are <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUKN3038243520080430">proposing a temporary lift</a> on the tax (an 18.4 cent one, mind you) for the summer so that a partial burden is lifted off the American people&#8217;s shoulders. Seriously? Barack Obama, who seems like the only candidate to understand the difference between political expediency and forward-thinking policies, has spoken against this repeal saying it does nothing to curtail consumption. And most economists agree.<br /><span id="more-10"></span></p>
<p>Thomas Friedman <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/30/opinion/30friedman.html?hp">writes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>This is not an energy policy. This is money laundering: we borrow money from China and ship it to Saudi Arabia and take a little cut for ourselves as it goes through our gas tanks. What a way to build our country.</p></blockquote>
<p>Paul Krugman provides us with a <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/gas-tax-follies/">quick lesson in economics</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The McCain/Clinton gas tax proposal comes too late for that. So it’s Econ 101: the tax cut really goes to the oil companies.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lovely. So two of the three potential presidents are supporting a plan that does little to help us, if not hurt us. What I don&#8217;t understand is what their economic advisers are actually advising them with. I understand that politicians want quick fixes that seem to help out average Americans while overlooking the long-term effects but when economists and like-minded individuals unanimously agree that its a terrible policy, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jv1_H8xsIs">why keep pushing it</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.motionforarecess.com/2008/05/01/the-gas-tax-repeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
